손해배상(기)
The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
Defendant Liembol Co., Ltd. 345,879,161 and 345.
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a party to the instant apartment in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, B and C (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
2) 17 Dongs (101 to 108 Dongs) and 109 to 117 Dongs are “5 blocks”.
In order to manage the 933 households, the organization consisting of its occupants. 2) Defendant Liembol is a company that constructed and sold the instant apartment building, which is a business entity and a contractor, and Defendant Korea Housing Guarantee is a company that entered into a warranty contract for the defects of the instant apartment between Defendant Liemol and Defendant Liemol.
B. The conclusion of the warranty contract and the pre-use inspection of the apartment of this case 1) Defendant Liibye Co., Ltd. on December 2, 2003 the warranty contract for the Defendant’s housing and the guaranty creditor to the astronomical market, which is the authority for usage inspection (hereinafter “instant warranty contract”).
Following the conclusion of the contract, the following table and 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3, 2. 2. 5, 2. 3, 2. 5, 2. 3, 2. 5, 2. 1, 2. 3, 2. 5, 2. 1, 2. 3, 2. 5, 2. 1, 20 , 2. 5 ,20 , 2. 5 ,20 , 2. 5 ,20 , 2. 5 ,20 ,20 , 1. 5 ,20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 227 , 20 , 4. 5 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 14. , 5 , 20 , 20 , 14 , 3. 5 , 20. , 14