소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal and all appeals by the defendant B, H, J and K are dismissed.
3. The Plaintiff and Defendant G have arisen.
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff alleged that the appraisal value of the appraiser of the first instance on each of the instant real estate was excessive; (b) Defendant B, H, J, and K alleged that the appraisal value of the appraiser of the first instance on each of the instant real estate was so calculated; (c) it is difficult to view that the comparative case or appraisal method selected by the appraiser of the first instance court is against the empirical rule or unreasonable; and (d) it cannot be deemed that the market price of each of the instant real estate was excessively high or low; and (e) it is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the reasons for the Defendants, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. As such, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants is legitimate. Thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal and the appeal by Defendant B, H, J, and K are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.