A. In the first instance court, the Plaintiffs filed a claim for damages against Defendant H, J, K, and P on the ground of joint tort; ② Defendant H’s claim for the return of loans from Defendant D and G on behalf of Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on the part of Co-Defendant Incorporated Incorporated Incorporated Co-Defendant D (hereinafter “D”); ③ DefendantO’s claim for the return of loans from Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on behalf of Defendant H on the part of the latter; ③ DefendantO’s claim for the return of the down payment and the intermediate payment against DefendantO on the part of Company A, AD (hereinafter “AG”); ④ Defendant H and Z’s affiliated companies (hereinafter “C”), E, E, “E,” and “F” with respect to Co-Defendant L of the first instance court.

(b) a claim for restitution of money was made on behalf of the person concerned; hereinafter the same shall apply).

In addition, Plaintiff A filed a claim for damages against Co-Defendant C, E, and F due to a corporation’s tort liability with respect to the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment with respect to the Co-Defendant C, E, and F, a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment with respect to the Co-Defendant C, a stock company (hereinafter “AF”), a claim for restitution with Defendant H for joint tort with respect to Co-Defendant I of the first instance trial, a claim for restitution of investment amount, a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment, a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment with respect to Defendant H or Z affiliated companies in subrogation of Defendant H or Z affiliated companies, and ④ Co-Defendant Q, Inc., Ltd. of the first instance trial and R

B. Accordingly, the first instance court dismissed both the plaintiffs' lawsuits against D, G, L, and defendantO and the plaintiff's lawsuits against M and N, and sentenced the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant H, J, K, and P and the plaintiff's claims against C, E, F, I, Q, and R to all of them.

C. Meanwhile, among the 105 designated parties who selected Plaintiff A from the first instance court as the designated parties, three of the 105 designated parties listed in the attached list No. 1 were also appointed by this court as the designated parties, and the 61 of the attached list No. 2 changed the designated parties to Plaintiff EF, and the rest of the designated parties.