If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On November 22, 2017, around 06:25, the Defendant was driving a four-lane 4-lane along the intersection in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government enzym, Seocho-gu, the Seocho-gu, the Seocho-gu, the Seocho-gu, as his duties, along the fourth-lane in the direction of the distance of the terminal from the shooting distance of the non-developed apartment.

Since there is a signal apparatus and crosswalk installed, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk and prevent the accident by safely driving it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant found out the victim F (n, 61 years old) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the left side of the direction of the course by the occupational negligence, in which the signal of the front intersection was red, and operated late on the left side of the direction of the course, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor. However, the Defendant reported the said car that intruded on the crosswalk, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor.

Ultimately, the Defendant got beyond the victim as above due to the above occupational negligence, and suffered approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment from the victim to the left-hand part of the satisfaction that requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant on the third public trial date;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of selective fine for punishment (the fact that there are extenuating circumstances in relation to the details of the crime, the first offender, and the fact that motor vehicle comprehensive insurance has been subscribed, etc.);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.