beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.06.28 2016가합236

채권조사확정재판에 대한 이의의 소

Text

1. The Busan District Court shall authorize the judgment for inspection and confirmation of rehabilitation claims 2012 and 53 dated December 16, 2015.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Pakistan for the purpose of owning ships. The Plaintiff is the parent company of the Plaintiff, and the Oral Help Shipping Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Odic Help Shipping”) is the original fishing vessel Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Odic Help”) is the original fishing vessel.

On March 22, 2012, Orart Shipbuilding was decided to commence rehabilitation on August 9, 2010 by Busan District Court 2012 Gohap3, Busan District Court 2012, but on January 27, 2012, the rehabilitation procedure was abolished and again decided to commence rehabilitation on July 25, 2012.

A and B, upon receiving the decision on commencing the rehabilitation procedure, were appointed as a joint manager of the original nuclear ship, the debtor for rehabilitation, and on March 13, 2017, B was dismissed, and C was appointed as a new joint manager on April 17, 2017.

(hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant" all the co-managers of the original fishing boat, including before and after the change of the co-manager.

The Articles of this Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Articles of this case") and 34,200,00 U.S. dollars between the Oral Twit Ship and the Oral KN-1006 (hereinafter referred to as the "the vessel of this case") on August 9, 2007.

I.3.(a) In the case of "(a)," translation is made into "Article I.3(a)."

descriptive and pres

3.(a) The vessel of this case must be constructed in conformity with the current regulations and rules of the Korean vessel level.

(b) The provisions, rules, and requirements of Korean level shall include the publication and effective as of the date of the conclusion of the instant contract.

Articles of Incorporation

Ⅲ Adjustment of the cost of shipbuilding vessels; and

1.(c) If the delivery of a ship is delayed by more than 180 days after the expiration of the above 180-day period, provided that the delivery of the ship is the due date for the shipbuilding (referring to the original shipbuilding; hereinafter the same shall apply).