However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 15, 2018, at around 03:35, the Defendant: (a) ordered food at a restaurant located in Busan Dong-gu B; and (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant: (c) ordered the victim of female employees in the restaurant to “draw so that they can walk at a cafeteria; (d)” and (e) interfered with the Defendant’s work, “I am for the same year, am for the last two years, am for the same year; and (e) died.

“Along with a large sound, I see that “I have expressed my opinion,” and that I see that I am to customers “I am, I am to whom I am, I am to whom I am, I am to whom I am to come,” if there is a complaint;

For about 10 minutes of the disturbance, such as bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, the disturbance bitch bitch bitch bitle, and the customer interfered with the business of the restaurant by force.

2. The Defendant, at around 03:50 on February 15, 2018, had 112 reported that the disturbance was avoided as described in paragraph 1 at the restaurant as described in paragraph 1, and had 112 confirmed the circumstances from the victim F, a police official belonging to the E District police unit, who was called out, and had 10 passengers, the Defendant may put the victim into the same bit of bitch bitch bitch, son, and son.

D. Doescing the word “farcing bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.”

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to a large voice "Irrith Ra".

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence is to suspend the execution of imprisonment in consideration of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime resulting from mental disorders. In addition, the sentence is imposed, such as the defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.