Around 22:00 on October 1, 2012, Defendant B driven the instant bus and stopped the instant bus in front of the exclusive movable household apartment road in front of the front of the instant bus at front of the Jeonju-si, and the instant bus in accordance with the stop signal while a movable police box was driven on the front section of the front section. When the signal was changed, Defendant B, as a bus driver, was obligated to take due care of the safety of passengers by taking into account the front section, the left section, and the passenger’s attitude, and operating the steering and operation of the instant bus accurately, but due to the negligence, he neglected such duty of care, led the Plaintiff, a passenger passenger of the instant bus, who was moving from the rear section of the instant bus, to go beyond the instant bus floor, resulting in the Plaintiff’s injury, such as brain, salute, salute, and salked salkite (hereinafter “instant accident”).

[Grounds for recognition] Each of Gap, 9-1, 9-2, 11-1-1-1-11-4, and 2-2-2 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

Judgment

According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B is the tortfeasor himself, and the Defendant Union is jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for all damages arising from the instant accident in accordance with the mutual aid agreement.

Since the Plaintiff was on board the bus of this case, the Plaintiff neglected to ensure the safety of the bus by properly cutting down and rapidly moving the knife in preparation for the departure of the bus, and thus, failed to do so. Such error was caused by the occurrence and expansion of the damage caused by the instant accident.