Seized knife No. 1 (Evidence No. 1) shall be confiscated from Defendant B.

1. At around 01:10 on April 25, 2012, the Defendants’ co-principaled the victim D, the victim E, the victim F, the victim G, and the victim H expressed their attitude by hand as follows: (a) Defendant A took a hack pipe (60 cm in length) that is a dangerous object in the victim’s surroundings at the time of her scambling, and did not inflict bodily harm on the victims; (b) Defendant B took a knife (37 cm in length) that is a dangerous object stored in the Defendant’s vehicle, and took a view that the victims would inflict bodily harm on the victims’ body.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly carried dangerous objects and threatened victims respectively.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, driven an IB car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.091% of alcohol content in blood at the place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each statement of E, D, G, H, and F;

1. Police investigation report (Investigation of the blades of seizure);

1. Police investigation report (the details of the direction of the prosecutor), and hearing statements of victims;

1. Police seizure records;

1. A copy of the circumstantial report of a host driver, and of the report identifying the host driver;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to seized articles, photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the defendant B and imprisonment) of the choice of criminal facts;

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation;