beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.10.04 2013고단3950

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 2, 2005, the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review on May 2, 2005, which constituted a violation of vehicle operation restriction by an employee of a defendant specified in the facts charged, lost its retroactive effect in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.