A. Since the articles in the separate sheet stating the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion are owned by the Plaintiff, the Defendant cannot enforce compulsory execution against the above articles based on the enforcement title against the diesel Global Co., Ltd.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the written evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as well as the fact-finding results of the Gwangju District Court’s Manpoon, the Defendant’s compulsory execution against the goods indicated in the separate sheet should be denied, since the goods listed in the separate sheet are recognized as owned by

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is justified.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.