Article 63 of the Criminal Act, Article 63 of the 2004HunMa481, etc.
The appeal of this case is dismissed.
According to the records, the claimant did not appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent and did not correct the correction within the correction period even after the applicant was ordered to appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent. Thus, the claimant's decision to dismiss it in accordance with Articles 25 (3) and 72 (3) 3 of the Constitutional Court Act.
July 6, 2004
Competence of the presiding judge
Justices Song Jin-in-Law