beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2009. 12. 17. 선고 2009나62358 판결

[소유권말소등기][미간행]

Plaintiff and appellant

Plaintiff 1 and three others (Law Firm Jinjin, Attorneys Noh Young-hee, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Defendant (Law Firm LLC, Attorneys Han-ho et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Intervenor joining the Defendant

Korea

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 19, 2009

The first instance judgment

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gahap78458 Decided June 16, 2009

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The part regarding the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked. The defendant will implement the procedure for the cancellation of ownership transfer registration, which was completed on January 3, 2008 by the Seoul Central District Court’s registry No. 274 with respect to each land specified in the list No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance with respect to the non-party 1 (the non-party 1) (the non-party 1 (the

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of the judgment of the court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the part concerning the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance is just and there is no ground to appeal against it, and it is dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kang Young-ho (Presiding Judge)