Cases

98Hun-Ma276 Revocation of Non-prosecution Disposition

Claimant

Maximum ○ In-depth

appellees

Prosecutor of the former District Prosecutors' Office

Text

The appeal of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

According to the records, the claimant did not appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent and did not correct the correction period even after having been ordered to appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent. Thus, pursuant to Articles 25(3) and 72(3)3 of the Constitutional Court Act, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Judges

Justices Kim Yong-han