98Hun-Ma276 Revocation of Non-prosecution Disposition
Maximum ○ In-depth
Prosecutor of the former District Prosecutors' Office
The appeal of this case is dismissed.
According to the records, the claimant did not appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent and did not correct the correction period even after having been ordered to appoint an attorney-at-law as his agent. Thus, pursuant to Articles 25(3) and 72(3)3 of the Constitutional Court Act, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
September 14, 1998
Justices Kim Yong-han
Justices Park Jong-sik
Justices Han Han-tae