2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below consistent with the following circumstances: (i) the victim made a mistake from the investigation agency to the court of the court of the court of the court below; (ii) the victim made a statement that he was plouted, plouted, and plouted by the victim's finger hand by drinking on August 28, 2013; (iii) the victim corresponds to the victim's statement by receiving a diagnosis of 1 knifbs in need of treatment on August 29, 2013, which is the following day of the instant case; and (iii) D also made a statement that the defendant made a plout and plouting of the victim's hand and finger, as the facts charged, it is recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.