2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around July 17, 2014, around 23:30 on July 17, 2014, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by openly brupting the victim “the victim E, who is a substitute driver, and the representative driver, and the apartment security guards, etc., hear.”

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant committed violence, such as the victim F, a policeman belonging to the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station, who received 112 report at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) and heard the statements of E of the above substitute driving engineer E, she took the victim’s bath, her blicker, and the victim’s blicker’s left blicker, and the victim’s blick with his hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported duties, and at the same time, the Defendant placed the victim a door-to-door open door, the two completions door door, etc. which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Each police statement of E and F;

3. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

4. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;