However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

1. The Defendants and C and D co-principaled Defendant A were married with E who is a citizen of the Republic of Korea on July 8, 2002 and stayed in Korea as a permanent resident qualification after marriage with E who is a national of the Republic of Korea on or around July 8, 2002. On September 2018, Defendant A and Defendant B conspiredd to have the remainder except for Defendant B’s other expenses upon request by F (F, G, and female).

On the other hand, Defendant B offered to her husband C that “if there is a male who is a Korean woman to marry, she shall be introduced to her husband,” and that C would give KRW 6 million to her husband D by means of disguised marriage with her husband.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make false recommendations in order to marry C, D and Thailand F with D. A.

On November 16, 2018, the Defendants entered false records, such as public electronic records, submitted a marriage report to a public official in charge of family relations who is aware of the fact that D had no intention to marry with F, an solar state, and had the public official in charge of family relations enter false facts in the family relation registration information system, which is a public electronic record, into the public official in charge of family relations.

B. The Defendants are C, D and C, and C, respectively.

At the same date, time, and place as mentioned above, D has D submit a report of marriage stating false facts to the public official in charge of the public service center's family relationship and have a public official who is not aware of such fact store and operate it in the family relation registration information system, which is a public electronic record.