beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.07.05 2012고정4653

위계공무집행방해

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around March 2005, the Defendant, as a shipbuilding Chinese, entered the Republic of Korea as a visa for residence (F-2) and entered the Republic of Korea as a visa for illegal stay, submitted documents that have completed education for a certain period at a designated technical education support center for overseas Koreans (hereinafter referred to as the “support group”), and submitted a letter of recommendation from the above support group to the Immigration Office, submitted it to the Immigration Office to obtain permission for change of sojourn status as visiting employment (H-2) visa, and was gathered with the head of the Do Private Teaching Institute E in Nam-gu, Incheon.

From October 1, 201 to March 25, 2012, the Defendant registered on an educational course that takes place at the end of six months (to the end of 14:00-18:05, day 09:10-13:15) and obtained permission for change of status of stay as a cost of general training (D-4). Even if the Defendant did not undergo education on October 30, 201, he/she signed “F” in the form of the student signature of the ex officio admission record management ledger prepared as if he/she had attended the relevant private teaching institute as if he/she had received education; around November 5, 201; around January 27, 2011; around January 21, 201; around February 5, 2012; around February 1, 2012; around December 1, 2012; and submitted ex officio documents verifying that he/she had been present; around March 21, 2017>

Since then, around March 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) through a G administrative agent delegated by the Incheon Immigration Office at the port-dong 7, Jung-gu, Incheon; (b) prepared a letter of recommendation and an application; and (c) obtained permission to change the status of sojourn for visa visa (H-2) under the name of the head of the Incheon Immigration Office on April 5, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the duty of changing the status of a public official in charge of the Incheon Immigration Office by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by witnesses E in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Copy of the attendance;