When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 18, 2017, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) the mobile phone agent called “C” in the “C” column of the mobile phone entrance application using a verification-type pen without authority; (b) the Defendant stated “D”, “E”, “E”, “E”, and “G” in the subscriber address column in the subscriber address column; and (c) stated “D” and “E” and “H new bank” in the name of the deposit account holder column of the payment method; and (d) written in the applicant column as “D” and “D” and the date of birth; and (d) written in the applicant column as “D” and written in the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for mobile phone purchase in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, submitted one copy of the application form for cell phone subscription in the above-mentioned name D, to a mobile phone agent who was aware of the forgery, and exercised the above investigation document as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Entry in the application for joining the LGU and the application of its existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;