However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 5. 5. 22:00 경 경기 광명시 B에 있는 'C' 앞에서 상의를 벗고 신발을 벗고 앉아 있던 중 “ 어떤 남자가 팬티만 입고 앉아 있다” 는 112 신고를 받고 그곳에 출동한 경기 광명 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 순 52호 순찰차를 향해 "야 이, 개새끼들 아 꺼져, 씨 발 놈들 니들이 나한테 해 준 게 뭐 있어 "라고 소리치며 옆에 놓여 있던 고무 슬리퍼와 피고인의 운동화를 집어 던지고, 순찰차에서 하차 한 위 지구대 소속 경찰 관인 경위 E을 향해 나머지 신발 한 짝을 집어던지고 위 경위 E의 멱살을 잡으려 하고, 이에 순경 F이 피고인을 공무집행 방해죄의 현행 범인으로 체포하려 하자 위 순경 F의 허벅지와 배를 발로 3회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Photographs photographs, etc. of victimized police officers;

1. A copy of the work log and the list of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning a CCTV image recording and a photographic act;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (elective of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Type 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) in the basic area (six months to one year and four months);

2. The defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, details of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime, etc. are committed, since he/she has been convicted of violence against the decision of sentence;