beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2016.02.04 2014가합102291

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 105,675,238 to Plaintiff Co., Ltd. and KRW 5% per annum from May 27, 2014 to February 4, 2016.

Reasons

Under the Quality Control and Safety Management of Industrial Products Act, the relevant Plaintiff company is a company that certifies the quality management system (referring to business activities that systematically designs, manages, and improves quality to achieve the goal of quality satisfaction of customers) of an enterprise, etc., and Plaintiff B is the representative director of the Plaintiff company, and the Defendant was working as the Plaintiff’s examiner from around 197 to March 5, 2013.

Plaintiff

The plaintiff company shall enter into a certification contract with an enterprise which wishes to be certified and issue a certificate after deliberation to the enterprise which has recommended the approval by the competent examiner, and after which the certification contract is conducted by the company.

Plaintiff

According to the certification contract entered into with a company, the certified company shall undergo a regular post-management review at six months or one year period, and undergo a renewal review at three-year period from the date of certification, which is the effective period of certification, and shall not convert the certification to another certification body during the effective period of certification unless the examination is defective or it is impossible to issue a certificate, and unless it has agreed in advance with the plaintiff company, it is agreed that the certification body only changes the certification body on the premise of the validity of the existing certification and its review period shall be maintained as it is).

Plaintiff

Conclusion, etc. of contracts between company and defendant

6. The equitableness management (iv) in particular, even when the contract with the Plaintiff Company has been terminated or terminated, the Plaintiff Company shall not convert the certified company registered with the Plaintiff Company into another certification body, provide the Plaintiff Company with information for conversion, or induce the Plaintiff Company by visit or telephone.

(5) The Defendant’s visit or telephone communications shall be certified as a certification body with which the certification body is related to the Defendant.