If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On June 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months by fraud, etc. at the District Court, and the above sentence became final and conclusive on June 28, 2014.

The defendant stolen the resident registration certificate of the victim B who made a friendly arrest, and opened the cell phone in the name of B using it, and thought to sell it.

1. On October 2, 2013, the Defendant cut off B’s resident registration certificates on the ground of B, which put up the gaps of B locked from the 2nd floor of Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, on the front line, and cut off B’s resident registration certificates.

2. On October 2, 2013, the Defendant drafted a new contract for mobile phone service that purchases a mobile phone service with the content of 1,067,000 won, stating the name and resident registration number of B in the subscriber column column E in the form of a mobile phone subscription application form in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, without B’s consent, and written N90S (gallon No. 3) in the name of the device model in the column of subscription details and written N900S (gallon No. 3) on the device model in the column of subscription.

Accordingly, with the aim of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the application form for mobile phone entry in B, a private document on rights and duties, which is another person's private document.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place, submitted one copy of the mobile phone subscription application in the name of B forged at the same time and at the same place as if he were duly formed to the staff-in-charge in charge of SKS.

4. When the Defendant demanded a mobile phone agency employee who was unable to know his name at the same time and place, the Defendant held the official document B’s resident registration certificate, which was a stolen official document, as if he were his resident registration certificate.

5. The fraud defendant is committed as if he purchases a normally mobile phone even though he did not have an intention or ability to pay a mobile phone price at the same date, at the same place, and is infallon 3 smartphones equivalent to the market value of 1,067,000 won from the victim E business owner.