beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2012.12.20 2012고정1689

대기환경보전법위반등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, respectively.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the defendant B Co., Ltd. in the Simju-si.

1. Defendant A

A. Although a person who intends to install air emission facilities in violation of the Clean Air Conservation Act must report to the administrative agency on the air emission facilities, the Defendant installed and used one printing building facility, which is 2.8 square meters in the Defendant B Co., Ltd., located in the field of strike from June 2009 to April 24, 2012, without reporting the air emission facilities.

B. Although a person discharging industrial wastes in violation of the Wastes Control Act voluntarily disposes of it or entrusted it to a person who has obtained permission for waste treatment business, the Defendant is above from June 2009 to April 24, 2012.

An average of 20ton of waste synthetic resin generated at the place specified in the port was entrusted to D without a license for waste treatment business.

2. Defendant B Company;

A. The Defendant violated the Clean Air Conservation Act No. 1

Defendant A, the representative of the defendant at the time and place stated in the paragraph, committed the same offense as the above facts in relation to the defendant's duties.

B. The Defendant violated the Wastes Control Act Article 1(b).

Defendant A, the representative of the defendant at the time and place stated in the paragraph, committed the same offense as the above facts in relation to the defendant's duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A report on investigation (the report on the enemy);

1. Investigation report (examination of types of wastes from the enemy);

1. A written confirmation of violation;

1. Copy of corporate register;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 90 Subparag. 1 and Article 23(1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act; Article 65 Subparag. 2 and Article 18(1) of the Wastes Control Act; selection of each fine;

B. Defendant B Stock Company: Articles 95, 90 subparag. 1, and 23(1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act; Articles 67, 65 subparag. 2, and 18(1) of the Wastes Control Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants among concurrent crimes: the Defendants.