However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 8, 2016, 08:24, the Defendant committed an indecent act in a non-fluent manner by closely sticking the Defendant’s bucks and the sexual flag to the victim’s name and unfluent mack, etc., with the line subway 2-4 partitions 9, which was operated in the direction of the sports complex in light of the light-fluent basin, and the victim’s name and unfluent mack, etc.

In addition, the Defendant: (a) stopped in the high speed terminal station; (b) moved the said subway to the 3-1 square column; and (c) committed an indecent act against the Defendant’s sexual flag and left bucks attached to the left side of the victim C (n, 27 years old); and (c) committed an indecent act against the victim C in a non-fished manner by closely sticking to the victim C’s turbuck.

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts against victims in the subway which is a means of public transportation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts to the effect that each legal statement of the witness C, D, and E (the defendant and his defense counsel may have any physical contact with the victims concentrated in the subway at the time, but they did not commit an indecent act against the victims.

그러나 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피해자인 증인 C의 진술은 중요 부분에서 그 신빙성이 인정되는 점( 피해자는 이 법정에서 ‘ 의도 적인 접촉인지 까지는 잘 모르겠다’, ‘ 추행에 대해 항의하거나 자세를 바꾸거나 자리를 옮기지는 않았다’, ‘ 밀착이 추 행이다’ 라는 취지로 진술하기도 하였으나, ‘ 고의적인 느낌을 받았다’, ‘ 성 기가 밀착되어 비벼대는 느낌을 받았다 ’라고 자신의 느낌과 추행 방법을 비교적 명확하게 진술하고 있고, 피해자가 당시 출근하는 길이어서 진술서도 나중에 작성할 정도로 상당히 바빴고, 그 상황을 피하려 했던 것으로 보이는 점, 젊은 여성인 피해자가 만원 전철 내에서 추행하는 남성에게 추행을 항의하기 어려운 것이 현실이고,...