beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.12.24 2013고정2346

상해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is about October 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:00, the Defendant found the following: (b) the C Apartment 129 Dong-dong 1601 in Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, and about to enter the ward as his parent and son E (seven years old); (c) the Defendant was the victim E who would have to enter the room first from the entrance, and (d) the victim E who would have to get off and get out of the entrance, i.e., the victim’s body that was pushed down with the aforementioned D and the victim’s body that was pushed down by hand, and she was seated down on the floor as a shock.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim E, such as a sponsor's pain, etc., of double wall that requires two weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

A. The evidence of criminal facts must be presented by the prosecutor, and the criminal facts must be proven by the judge so high probability that there is no reasonable doubt, and if there is no evidence to establish such a degree of conviction, the defendant is suspected to be guilty.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 92Do327, Mar. 23, 1993; 2012Do6522, Aug. 23, 2012). (b)

Major evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case is D, E, and F’s investigative agencies, legal statements, medical certificates, and CDs.

However, D and E make a statement to the effect that the Defendant was forced to go beyond the Defendant’s chest by pushing the Defendant’s chest, and that the Defendant was forced to go Eul. If he was pushed the chest, it would be against the rule of experience to the effect that the breast part of the chest should be cut off, and that there was an injury to the symptoms and cerebral typhism in the double wall spath, because it would be against the rule of experience.

The defendant is a adult of 166 cm, who is the defendant, E is a male baby in 2006, E is only seven years of age at the time of the case, and the body is also narrow compared to the future. E is on the floor of the entrance, and the defendant was in a ward with a little degree of living room than the entrance, if the defendant was in a situation.