When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide it for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, on December 2, 2018, the Defendant received 20,000 won per week from the deceased and deceased in his name at the dwelling place of the Defendant of the Defendant of the Dong-si B building B in the Gu-si Building C, and consented to the 20,000 won per week from the Defendant’s name.

On December 2, 2018, the Defendant sent all documents, such as a new contract for the subscription of a mobile phone, identification card, etc., to the above person in the name of the Defendant as a photographic file, and opened the cell phone D in the name of the Defendant by verifying that he/she opened the cell phone in the phone of the telecommunications business operator asking whether he/she opened the cell phone, and provided him/her with the name omitted after receiving KRW 20,000 per 1 mobile phone.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the use of telecommunications services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes requesting the provision of communications data, respective replies and communication confirmation data;

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 97 and 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act on the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Since there is no change of circumstances to be considered in sentencing after notification of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order shall be maintained as it is.