국유재산 사용수익허가 거부처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
Parts used for repair shall be as follows. Parts of the 6th parallel 3 to 13.
【Nos. 1 through 3 (including the number number, if any)
(3) Of the land of this case, the land of this case is limited to the use of the land of this case for the purpose of the extension of the existing use and the future use of the land of this case, and the possibility that the existing road will collapse cannot be ruled out if the land of this case is opened by extending the passage of 2 meters. (2) The plaintiff asserts that even if the land of this case is opened by expanding the passage of 2 meters wide, the existing situation does not have high risk of collapse. However, the above assertion is insufficient to acknowledge the above assertion. However, there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. (3) Where the land of this case among the land of this case is opened by expanding the entry into the land of this case for the purpose of the construction permit of this case, which is a state-owned land upon the plaintiff's application, the land of this case is opened by expanding the entry into the land of this case to the right of use of the land of this case, which can be seen to be the land of this case as the land of this case for the purpose of Article 10 (1) of the State Property Act.