beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.07.17 2015구단3051

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 17, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3, and 30 days of stay), and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on July 16, 2012.

B. On April 7, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer persecution” as a refugee requirement under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 이그보(Igbo)족 출신으로 이그보족의 옛 국가인 비아프라(Biafra) 분리 독립 운동 조직인 마솝(MASSOB)에 가담하였다.

2011년 대규모 시위에서 마솝의 수장 B가 체포되었고, 원고는 청년 지도자로서 경찰에 체포된 간부 조직원의 석방을 요구하는 시위를 주도하는 등 비아프라의 독립을 위해 대규모 시위를 이끌며 왕성한 활동을 하였다.

As a result, the plaintiff escaped to the Republic of Korea with the help of her assistants, and when the plaintiff returned to the Republic of Korea, there is a concern that the government and the police may threaten the life and body of the plaintiff, or threaten the life and body for political reasons.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, and the instant disposition is unlawful.

B. Determination 1) In full view of the provisions of Article 2 subparag. 3 and Article 76-2(1) of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; Article 1 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees; and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, the Defendant is deprived of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.