When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, around March 27, 2019, the Defendant applied for the purchase of “C” Internet telephone services under the Defendant’s name in the Defendant’s residence located in Suwon-si District B, from around April 9, 2019 to around April 9, 2019, and opened a total of eight telephone lines, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table of crimes. On April 11, 2019, the Defendant transferred the Internet telephone machine via the door-to-door via the door-door via the door-to-door phone via the door-to-door phone via the door-to-door phone line in the on-site mail handling country located in 5-4, Hong-si, 2019, to use it for communications.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another's communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Institute of Certified Joining Communications Services to a request for provision of communications data;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and Article 30 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;