beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.08.18 2014가합104583

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. 43,492,119 won in cases of Defendant Barunum Co., Ltd. and its corresponding amount from May 21, 2014 to August 201, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties, etc.) The plaintiff is Ulsan-gu A apartment (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").

(2) In order to manage 298 households and ancillary facilities, a limited-liability housing company (hereinafter “non-party company”) is a business entity that constructed and sold the apartment of this case. The real time company of the apartment of this case was a stock company. However, on February 3, 2009, a lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot of lot.

4. 17. A merger was made with Defendant Slunium corporation.

The above companies, regardless of whether before or after the merger, shall be referred to as "the defendant company" in total, and the name of the above company shall be separately explained, if necessary, but the indication of the corporation shall be omitted.

(1) The Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter “Defendant Mutual Aid Association”) is a company that performed the construction work of the instant apartment upon contract.

It is an association that has entered into a warranty contract for the apartment of this case on behalf of the defendant company.

(b) Conclusion of a contract;

7. Warranty liability period and warranty bond: Article 30 (Defect Security) and (2) of the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction Works under Article 38 of the Housing Construction Promotion Act and Articles 16, 16-2 and 17 of the Decree on the Management of Multi-Family Housing (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) shall repair all defects arising from the relevant construction work from the date on which the “A” (referring to the “Defendant Company” in this case) takes over the entire subject matter and the date on which the completion inspection is completed, whichever comes first, from the date on which the “A” (referring

(A) On April 9, 2003, the non-party company, Co., Ltd., which was a joint executor, contracted the construction of the instant apartment to the Defendant company, and the said contract was concluded between the non-party company and the Defendant by the contract for the alteration of the construction contract around August 2004.