beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.05 2018고단1540

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On December 9, 2017, from around 22:15 to 22:30 the same day, the Defendant interfered with his duties is “D Mart” operated by the injured party C on the first floor of the Suwon-si building B in Suwon-si, and prevents the injured party, who was in front of that place, from doing so, and prevents him from doing so.

N. N.N. L.N.

The phrase " shall be repeated," and the victim shall leave the defendant.

Despite the demand, customers who continued to prevent customers from entering the Mat for about 15 minutes such as keeping the face of the victim, or attempting to take the victim's hand, were prevented from entering the Mat.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victimized person.

2. On December 9, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 22:40, who was arrested by the Defendant on the road prior to the “D Mart,” and was reported by 112, to the head of F, a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station E District Unit of the Suwon District Police Station, for the suspicion of interference with the performance of duties, and boarded the F, a police officer who stopped on the road at the lower seat of the police station, on the charge of obstructing the performance of duties, on board the back seat of the police officer, who was arrested of the F, a flagrant offender at the seat of the police station, and tried the head of F, who was the F, to take a bath that the F, attempted to get on the side of the Defendant, “F, sp. sp. sp. sp.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written statement of C and G;

1. Photographs of the victim, photographs of the victimized police officer, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the relative investigation of a shot G) and a report on investigation (the hearing of a victim C telephone statement interfering with duties);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the defendant has divided and reflected the crime in this case).