However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant, along with B, C, D, E, etc., in the case of credit loans handled by a lending company, with a credit rating lower than that of other loans, or with a view to taking part in the loan by accepting loan by forging or falsely preparing various documents necessary for the loan even though there is no other asset. The Defendant: (a) requested the lender to forge the loan documents as so-called “total liability”; (b) instructed the borrower to give necessary answers when receiving the confirmation telephone related to the loan; and (c) took overall control over the loan brokerage business, such as receiving the confirmation telephone as to the loan applicant’s position as if the applicant is in office; and (c) C has forged relevant documents such as the details of the loan transactions as if the applicant was paid as if he were in office in the lending company; and (d) has introduced the loan applicant B as so-called “high-level good offices,” and (d) has the role of making the loan applicant’s signature and deception as the lending applicant’s “loan by means of the above lending method,” and (e) has the role of making the loan applicant’s signature and the guarantor respectively.

1. According to the foregoing public offering with Section B, etc., the Defendant: (a) at the office of “H” in the Dong-gu, Gwangju on January 28, 2015, the Defendant entered “2014.031”; (b) “2,800,000” in the column of the column of the details of the deposit and withdrawal transactions in the name of KB National Bank; and (c) in the remitter column, the Defendant received KRW 2,80,000 as monthly salary from the “G” for the purpose of paying benefits, notwithstanding the fact that he did not receive KRW 2,80,000,000 from the “G” for the purpose of monthly payment.