화장품법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged despite the fact that the Defendant participated in labeling or advertising as indicated in the judgment below.
2. Examining the judgment below in light of the circumstances such as the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor, in particular, the grounds for supporting the prosecutor's appeal, and the fact that the defendant does not have any direct evidence to acknowledge the fact that the defendant participated in labeling or advertising as stated in the judgment below, the court below's judgment on not guilty of the facts charged is sufficiently acceptable, and there is an error of law by mistake
subsection (b) of this section.
Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.