해고무효확인
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The table of reasons for the basic facts was attached in attached Form. A.
The relationship 1) The defendant is a government-funded research institute established on November 7, 1991 under the Act on the Establishment, Operation and Fostering of Government-Funded Science and Technology Research Institutes, Etc., and is a special corporation established for the purpose of efficient use of energy. 2) The plaintiff was employed as a researcher at the Korea Institute of Energy and Resources, a telegraph of the defendant on March 1, 1990. The plaintiff was promoted as the responsible researcher on September 1, 1997. Since September 1, 1999, the defendant was working as the head of the defendant B team. From June 26, 2007, the defendant C Headquarters D Center E, while working as the Ministry of Science and Technology E, controlled research tasks, such as solar power generation-related government tasks, testing and evaluation of solar energy, and working as the responsible research institute from December 18, 2009.
B. On May 1, 2012, the Prosecutor of the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office prosecuted the Plaintiff on charges of having received a bribe in relation to his/her duties, etc. Of the facts charged against the Plaintiff, the part relating to the instant case among the facts charged against the Plaintiff is as follows.
On October 12, 2009, charges for the receipt of the bribe roof construction cost on the charge of the crime No. 12, 2009: A request from the former G of the FF corporation certified as a product by the Defendant for the free installation of the sun-solids on the Plaintiff’s residential roof. On October 12, 2009, the roof construction and the installation of the sun-solids for occupational embezzlement on October 12, 2009: While maintaining the 206th of the sun-solars owned by the Defendant for business purposes, 186 Chapter 186 was installed on the Plaintiff’s residential roof on March 10, 208; the payment of the bribery bribe advisory fee on November 10, 201: A corporation’s regular director I and on February 25, 2008, even though he/she did not provide consultation on the conclusion of the consultation contract on February 25, 2008.