However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates “C”, which is a painting company located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B.

No person who installs and operates an air pollutants emission facility shall operate any business using the emission facility without operating a preventive facility to prevent air pollutants.

Nevertheless, from August 2013 to August 26, 2014, the Defendant operated 158.1 cubic meters of a drying facility, which is a air discharge facility, in the said place, and failed to operate a smoking facility, which is a preventive facility connected to the said discharge facility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The application of business registration certificate, each field photo, investigation reporting Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 89 subparagraph 3 of the Clean Air Conservation Act and Article 31 (1) 1 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (not less than fine, but more than other criminal records, taking into account the reflection of the sentence);