공사대금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act) provides that the court shall accept the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except that the court shall dismiss the part concerning the waiver of the benefit of prescription (the second part concerning the waiver of the benefit of prescription) as stated in the following Paragraph 2.
2. On or around February 21, 2013, 201, 200: (a) the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff would have given up the payment of part of the above construction cost through additional consultation with the Plaintiff on March 27, 2013; (b) the Plaintiff would have given up the payment of the said construction cost; (c) however, on or after August 4, 2011, the date on which the approval was given, it is apparent that the Plaintiff’s assertion was made in itself, and thus, (d) it is concluded that the Defendant would have given up the payment method for the said construction cost several times; and (e) the Plaintiff would have received the payment method for the said construction cost from the Plaintiff on or around March 27, 2013; and (e) on or after the date on which the extinctive prescription period for the instant construction and additional construction cost claims was expired, the Defendant would not immediately be subject to the interruption of extinctive prescription benefit from the expiration of extinctive prescription period of 2016.