임금
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 5,257,577 and KRW 1,006,838 from October 26, 2013, and KRW 918,000.
Basic Facts
The defendant was established with the permission of the Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs on June 12, 2008 for the purposes of promoting friendship among Vietnam War veterans and enhancing the rights and interests of members of the Vietnam War veterans (hereinafter referred to as "previous incorporated association"), and was amended by Act No. 11818, May 22, 2013, and was newly established on January 17, 2012.
4. 18. Implementation
(a) The same shall apply;
() Around October 2012, the Plaintiff was designated as a prescribed organization under Article 18-2 and changed its name as at the present time. The Plaintiff was appointed as at the principal meeting and the Promotion Committee of Public Law Organizations on February 10, 201, where the Defendant was the former incorporated association, respectively. According to the Articles of Incorporation at the time, the term of office of executive officers of the branch was three years. On September 5, 2012, the Plaintiff was granted B appointment from the Defendant until December 31, 2013. The Plaintiff was granted the term of office by the Defendant as at December 41, 2012 (hereinafter “instant Articles of Incorporation”).
The part related to the instant case is as indicated in the attached Form. The Plaintiff shall prepare a written employment contract with the Defendant during the contract period on January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (hereinafter “instant employment contract”).
) Accordingly, on October 14, 2013, the Defendant was dismissed on October 14, 2013, among those that were paid KRW 918,00,00 in the month of Many Number of Months, and KRW 1,836,00 in the even number of months of even number, the Defendant was notified that he was dismissed by the Defendant’s board of directors on October 25, 2013. The Plaintiff asserted that the above dismissal resolution is null and void, and the Plaintiff won by filing a lawsuit to confirm the invalidity of the B Removal Resolution. Accordingly, the Defendant filed an appeal and appeal, but all of which was dismissed, and became final and conclusive on October 20, 2015 (hereinafter “related civil case”).
Meanwhile, upon the Defendant’s accusation, the Plaintiff rendered a judgment on the violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation).