Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

A. In addition, it is sufficient to conclude that part of the items asserted by the Plaintiff as the details of the additional construction works, as indicated below, are already explained in the “Contract Statement” (Evidence A) included in the terms of the contract of this case or the relevant construction documents, such as specifications, etc., and that part of the remainder is difficult to conclude that the Plaintiff additionally performed construction works exceeding the scope of the construction works under the initial contract, on the grounds that there is no obvious evidence to prove that the construction works have been actually performed.