violation of a special law

2. Kim iron;

Defendant Kim Jong-sung, Inc., Ltd., in collusion with the company located in the Do governor of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province on April 11, 2007 without obtaining permission from the Governor of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, Defendant Kim Jong-chul, at the above company located in the Dog-ri river located in the Dog-si of Seopoon on April 2007, requested to change the natural seat point (150 centimeters, 120 centimeters, 120 centimeters, 70 centimeters, 1 centimeters, 60 centimeters in width, 100 centimeters, 90 centimeters in width, 10 centimeters), 3 points in the above natural seat to be loaded at the Do-Governing Province at a free price on May 11, 207, and requested the above company to transport the above natural seat point at the Do-si on May 11, 200, and Defendant Kim Jong-soo to enter the above natural seat point at the 16th of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province on March 14, 96.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of the completion of a lecture;

1. An annual report;

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Article 360, Article 358 subparag. 4, Article 296(5) of the Special Act on the Establishment of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and the Development of Free International City, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines)

1. Detention in a workhouse (the Defendants)

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Suspension of sentence (the Defendants)

Considering Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act, such as the stones extracted from stone collection stations that remain after being processed for stone: Fines 1,00,000 for defendant Kim Jong, Fines 400,00 for defendant Kim iron, KRW 00 for conversion, and KRW 50,000 for each day)

Judgment on Defendants’ assertion

Since the Defendants asserted that the instant stone is not natural stone, it is reasonable to recognize the fact that the instant stone was processed as stone in the process of processing the stone in the stone plant. However, even if it is remaining stones in the process of processing, it is reasonable to view the Defendants’ assertion as natural stone still as long as it is not processed for using it as stone, etc.