매매대금
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The defendant shall pay the warranty bond from the plaintiff 15,435.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff entered into a household supply contract with the Defendant as follows, and supplied the Defendant with the goods such as furniture (hereinafter “instant goods”).
(hereinafter referred to as “instant supply contract”. (1) 1. - General household/Ban household supply contract date: January 13, 2015 - Contract amount of general household/Ban-raw materials, - Contract amount of 84,279,960 (Additional dues): - On-site construction site of 121-81, 120, 300, 200, 300, 200, 300, 200, 200, 30,000,000: - General household/Ban-1,000,000,000,000: 3:0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
B. The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff totaling KRW 287,113,678 from February 16, 2015 to September 24, 2015 under the above supply contract: (a) the total amount of the above contract amount including the value added tax is KRW 308,709,709,159 [=280,64,690 + KRW 102,364,730 KRW 102,364,730 KRW 94,70,00), 1.5,481 (= KRW 308,709,159 KRW - KRW 287,113,678)]; and (b) the payable amount is KRW 21,59,481 (=308,709,159 KRW - KRW 287,678).
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1 to 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion regarding the cause of the claim.