A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

가. 피고인 ⑴ 사실오인 ㈎ 제1원심판결 중 피해자 T 부분에 관하여 피고인은 AH와 함께 피해자의 투자금으로 부산, 대구지점을 설립ㆍ운영하기로 하였을 뿐 공소사실과 같은 사업현황이나 재무상태에 관한 거짓말을 하지 않았고, V지점의 경우 상호권 분쟁 종결 후 설립ㆍ운영하기로 하여 투자금을 미리 받았던 것이지 이미 운영중인 것처럼 거짓말을 한 사실이 없으며, 이모티콘 캐릭터 사업의 경우 실제로 진행을 하였으므로 피해자를 기망한 것이 아니다.

㈏ 제1원심판결 중 피해자 AC 부분에 관하여 피해자는 T의 처 AJ의 설명을 듣고 T의 부산 및 대구지점 투자자 지위를 이어받기로 하였던 것이지, 피고인이 피해자를 기망한 사실은 없다.

In addition, the defendant's talking about the appointment of the assistant director of the art gallery to the victim was prepared for opening the future art gallery, but it did not receive the investment fund on the condition of employment of the assistant director.

㈐ 제2원심판결(피해자 D)에 관하여 피고인은 피해자로부터 5,000만 원을 투자받았으나 예상외로 수익이 나지 않았던 것일 뿐, 편취할 의도로 위 돈을 차용한 것이 아니었다.

B. The sentence of unfair sentencing (the first instance court: imprisonment with prison labor for two years and the second instance court: imprisonment with prison labor for two months) of the lower court is excessively unreasonable.

B. The first instance court’s sentence of the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. On the part of the judgment of the first and second lower courts, the prosecutor respectively filed an appeal against the judgment of the first lower court, and the arguments in the appeal case against each of the above judgment of the lower court were combined at the trial of the first and second lower court.

Therefore, each of the crimes in the first and second original judgments, which were sentenced to the same kind of punishment against the defendant, is a concurrent crime under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and a single sentence shall be sentenced pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. Thus, the first and second original judgments shall be maintained