However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant had filed an application with the Gangwon Islands for a stop from entering the casino and had a mind to forge a driver's license to enter the casino in a state where no entry is possible.

1. On September 6, 2014, the Defendant forged a public document: (a) deleted the name of the driver’s license from “A” and the resident registration number C; (b) attached the film paper printed in the name column, “D” and “E” to the resident registration number column; and (c) attached the film screen paper in contact.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, has forged one driver's license for the defendant under the name of the commissioner of the Gyeongbuk Police Agency.

2. At around 11:05 on September 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) presented the forged driver’s license to the F, who was required to present an identification card from the security personnel F at the Ganwon Islands Casino Search Team located in Gangwon-do, Seowon-gun, Gangwon-do; and (b) presented it to the said F, who is aware of the real nature of the forged driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to A by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Where social risks have not been realized because the ultimate objective of the crime was not achieved due to the forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents, etc. (the scope of recommendations), types 1 (non-business and non-organization), mitigation area (one year from April to one year) (special mitigation) of the sentencing criteria;

2. Considerations, such as the reflection of the sentence imposed, the first offender, and the failure to achieve the purpose of the said Article.