양수금
1. The Defendants jointly and severally discharged the Plaintiff’s Intervenor from KRW 77,537,364 and KRW 43,876,674 among them to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor. < Amended by Act No. 12873, Dec. 21, 2014>
1. The plaintiff's successor's claim
(a) Indication of claims: To describe the cause of claims and the changed cause of claims as shown in attached Form;
(However, the "creditor" is the plaintiff, and the "debtor" is the defendant, and the payment order has become final and conclusive. (B)
Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. On December 12, 2014, while the Plaintiff’s claim was pending in the instant lawsuit, transferred to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor the claim of this case against the Defendants, the Plaintiff’s claim is groundless.
(Plaintiff filed an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit, but the withdrawal has no effect due to the lack of consent by the Defendants).