도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On October 8, 1994, at around 06:08, the driver C of the Defendant’s charge, as the driver of the d refratter, violated the above restriction of traffic by operating the 1.1 ton of the d refratator, which was operated in excess of 1.1 ton of the d refratator, even though the local government of the 312-line dratator was a place where the passage of more than 10 ton of the dratator was restricted on the d
2. The grounds for Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Dec. 29, 201; Act No. 8976, Dec. 29, 201; Act No. 2014, Dec. 29, 201; Act No. 20135, Dec. 25, 2011; Act No.
Thus, the above facts charged constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.