beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.11.27 2020나53579

기타(금전)

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

. The purport of the claim is.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part of the decision of the court of first instance in which the “Defendant bank account” in No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is raised to the “Defendant Bank account (M; hereinafter “Defendant Bank Account”) account.”

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court is "in the account of the defendant bank" in Part 14 of the judgment of the third instance.

The term “in the Defendant bank account” in No. 1 of the fourth table of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to “in the first account”.

The term “in the Defendant bank account” in No. 3 of the fourth table of the judgment of the first instance court is raised from the Defendant bank account to “in the Defendant bank account (N).”

“At the end of June 8, 2018, from February 7, 2018,” the fourth person of the judgment of the first instance added “from February 7, 2018.”

In the seventh sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the ratification of unauthorized representation or invalidation shall vest in his/her own act with the knowledge of the existence of unauthorized representation, etc., and it does not require a certain method with respect to the method of expressing his/her intent, so it shall not be asked explicitly or implicitly. However, in order to recognize implied ratification, there must be circumstances to sufficiently understand the legal status of his/her act and to recognize that the result of his/her act belongs to himself/herself on the basis of his/her intention, even though he/she can sufficiently understand the legal status of his/her act and, therefore, there should be circumstances to deem that he/she should be sufficiently aware of the legal status of his/her act and that the result of his/her act belongs to him/her, so in determining it, he/she shall be careful by comprehensively examining various relevant circumstances (see, e.g.

The part of the 8th judgment of the first instance court to the 14th to the 114th 'the 11th 'the 11th 'the 11th 'the 14th 'the 14th 'the 10th '

(2) The claim for the return against the above amount of reimbursement has been rejected.