사해행위취소
1. Inherited property concluded on October 24, 2012 between the defendant and the non-party B regarding the real estate stated in the separate sheet.
1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;
2. Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment by non-drawing);
3. The Plaintiff’s dismissal portion claimed damages for delay from the day immediately following the date of this judgment, but the obligation to pay compensation for the value arising from the revocation of a fraudulent act occurs only when the formation judgment becomes final and conclusive, which serves as the premise, and thus, it cannot be held liable for delay before the judgment becomes final and conclusive. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for damages for delay exceeding the above recognition scope is without merit.