2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. From January 10, 2019 to November 10, 2019, the Plaintiff served as the 3rd class of the 3rd class of the 3rd class of the 3rd class of the JJ.

At around 08:30 on June 10, 199, when a person subject to disciplinary action was employed as the President of the IJ, on the ground that he/she publicly insulting K, L, M, He/she N, and the competent officerO stated that he/she reflected the schedule for the examination of physical strength during the period of 7:9 distribution to the victim's middle class K, L, M, Ha, N, and the competent officer "(6.11)", he/she was able to take three times on his/her book, and did not gather the Army Pocketbook and Y on his/her book, and he/she was compelled to take three times on his/her book, and "at the time of training, he/she is allowed to take various leave," and "at the end, he/she would not obey the requirements of disciplinary action" (hereinafter referred to as "grounds 1"), "at the end, he/she will not comply with the obligations of an individual participant during the period of 10 years" and "at the end, he/she will not submit an individual recommendation."

(hereinafter referred to as "Disciplinary Reason 2"). (b)

On July 18, 2019, the Defendant imposed a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 56 of the Military Personnel Management Act (hereinafter “instant measure”) on the following grounds:

C. On August 6, 2019, the Plaintiff was above B.

On December 20, 2019, the appeal commission dismissed the plaintiff's appeal.

【Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Entry of Evidence A Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings】

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. With respect to the grounds for disciplinary action No. 1 of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff did not call that the Plaintiff did not either satisfe his book or satisfe his book or satisfe his book or satisfe his book or satisfe his book or sat

Furthermore, the grounds of disciplinary action No. 1.