beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.10.06 2016고정955

대기환경보전법위반등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A was the representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd., a manufacturing and manufacturing company of the previous application equipment located in Kimpo-si, and was engaged in the manufacturing and manufacturing of the animal site by using the aforementioned facilities, without filing a report on installation of each emission facility as to the seal-emitting equipment (power 5.5kw, volume 25.76 cubic meters), one device-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-emitting equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment-making equipment

2. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, committed each of the offenses described in paragraph (1) against Defendant A in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written statement (list 5), a written confirmation (list 6), a E, or F (list 8);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photograph (List 9);

1. Defendant A: Article 90 subparagraph 1 of the same Act, Article 23 (1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act, Article 76 subparagraph 2 of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act, Article 33 (1) of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act (including violations of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act), and Article 95, Article 90 subparagraph 1 of the same Act, Article 23 (1) of the Clean Air Conservation Act (including violations of the Clean Air Conservation Act), and Articles 81, Article 76 subparagraph 2 of the same Act, and Article 33 (1) of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act (including violations of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act) of the Clean Air Conservation Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. It appears that each of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the confession, reflectivity, the previous or the same kind of violation have been corrected after the crackdown;