(심리불속행) 이 사건 세금계산서는 공급자의 기재가 사실과 다른 세금계산서이며, 원고의 선의 ・ 무과실도 인정할 수 없음[국승]
Daegu High Court 2012Nu738 (2012.09.07)
Cho High Court Decision 2010Du3539 ( October 26, 2011)
(C) The tax invoice of this case is a false tax invoice, and the plaintiff's good faith and negligence are not recognized.
(C) The Plaintiff’s good faith and without fault may not be recognized in light of the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s tax invoice is a tax invoice that differs from the Plaintiff’s entry; (b) the Plaintiff has operated the gas station for a long time; (c) the Plaintiff purchased the oil at the container; and (d) the type of the ticket is different from the normal type of the ticket; and (d) the location of the oil reservoir, the time of shipment, the shipment number
Article 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act
2012Du21949 Revocation of Disposition, etc. of Imposition of Value-Added Tax
Park XX
Head of the tax office and one other
Daegu High Court Decision 2012Nu738 Decided September 7, 2012
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized as groundless. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided
Reference materials.
If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final