사해행위취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are the same purport as the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate even if the evidence additionally submitted in the court of first instance was
Therefore, the reasoning of this court shall be as follows: ① “The entry of No. 1-A of the order” in Part 17 of Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance into “written claim”; ② “The sales contract No. 412 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed “No. 1”; “this court” in Part 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed “the court of first instance”; “this court” in Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed “this court from the court of first instance”; “No. 7 of Part 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed “No. 2020, Jun. 21, 2019,” and “No. 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “the date on which the arguments of first instance are closed”; “No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “the date on which the arguments of this case are closed”; and “No. 83 of the judgment of first instance” shall be deemed to be attached.
2. Parts to be dried;
C. The establishment of a fraudulent act, the intention of the debtor's intentional act, and the act of changing the beneficiary's malicious debtor's selling of real estate, which is only his/her own property, into money which can be consumed, constitutes a fraudulent act against the creditor, barring special circumstances. Therefore, the debtor's intent to harm is presumed, and the burden of proof that the purchaser did not
(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2000Da41875, Apr. 24, 2001). Each entry in the evidence Nos. 4 through 6 is different.